PIRATES SEIZE DANISH YACHT: Ben Franklin Founded the U. S. Marines to Stop Muslim Pirates
According to news wires, Somali pirates seized a Danish yacht with three children and seven adults on board, as reported by the Danish foreign ministry.
But what is the key word missing from this story? Muslim. As in Muslim pirates.
Why is it that the “M” word has been stricken from so many news stories? Why has it become so ‘politically incorrect’ to say that 9/11 attackers were Muslim? Or to say Muslim pirates are Muslim?
Routinely Muslim Pirates hijack Western ships and threaten to kill their hostages. Why? Because they are ordered to do so in the Quran. It’s an open secret. But why is writing about it ‘forbidden’?
Available for Talk Show interviews on this topic are any of the following Islamic experts:
WALID SHOEBAT, a former Pirate and Islamic Terrorist, who once detonated a bomb on the roof of an Israeli bank, thinking he was doing God and man a favor.
IQ AL-RASSOOLI, an Islamic scholar who gives chapter and verse of what the Quran has to say about justifiable piracy and other atrocities sanctioned by ‘religion.’
AVI LIPKIN, former translator in the Israeli Prime Minister’s office and author of multiple books on Islam.
Your guest or guests also can share the intriguing history of the threat of the Muslim Barbary Pirates commandeering US ships at sea and the centuries-long extortion by Muslims from ‘infidels’.
In the late 1700s, Islamic Pirates demanded tributes be paid by our founding fathers and early colonists to ‘protect’ them from having their merchant ships seized.
In 1784, Congress directed Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams to make treaties with the Barbary States. Perhaps the Obama administration can learn something from wise old Ben and stop appeasement attempts toward an anti-Western belief system that just makes US look weak.
Benjamin Franklin hated giving money to Islamic pirates. The majority of early American tax revenues were used to pay-off Islamic pirates, who demanded that Americans be subservient to Muslim pirates. Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson finally got fed up with paying the 20% shake-down ‘tax’ Muslim pirates levied on US ships, and Benjamin Franklin and a band of patriots (meeting in the Tun Tavern in Philadelphia!) founded the US Marines to protect the US from the Islamic pirates.
With Libya being in the news lately we’ve heard the word ‘Tripoli’ more lately but why is the word Tripoli in the lyrics of the Marine anthem that is still sung today? You know, the one that goes like this: ‘From the Halls of Montezuma to the Shores of Tripoli, we will fight our country’s battles on the land and in the sea’? Well, those lyrics are referring to the MUSLIM nation of Tripoli, demanding tribute, a.k.a. extortion, from Americans.
Thomas Jefferson believed there would be no end to tribute and in 1786 had a meeting with an Islamic Ambassador who claimed he had the right, per the Qur’an to take tribute and take slaves of their prisoners and that every Muslim soldier killed in battle would go straight to Paradise. Americans paid millions of dollars in tributes before Jefferson prevailed and went to war against the Muslim pirates.
Walid Shoebat has written on the topic of pirates in his book, “Why we want to Kill You,” that goes into detail on the Islamic piracy on the seas in the 1700s that our founding fathers had to deal with, and Walid suggests that the Obama administration should take the same measures as our founders.
A couple of years ago during a prior Islamic Piracy on the high seas, Rush Limbaugh said on air, “Now, you know, I may need to be corrected here, ladies and gentlemen. I just identified the Somali pirates as ‘Muslim.’ I could be wrong about this. The president said that we are not at war with Islam…Now, apparently elements of Islam are at war with us, but we are not at war with them. So if we’re not at war with Islam, then it must mean the Somali pirates are not Muslim, right? ‘Cause we’re not at war with them! …Maybe they’re Orthodox Jews! Well, if they aren’t Muslim, they gotta be something. If it’s not Orthodox Jews, maybe it’s reformed Jews. Maybe it’s evangelicals…Maybe the Somali pirates are actually evangelicals! Maybe they’re Southern Baptists. Who knows? But they can’t be Muslim because we’re not at war with Islam…My guess is it’s the Orthodox Jews. It’s Orthodox Jews committing piracy in the open seas off Somalia. There’s no question in my mind…Look, the Somali pirates are Muslims. If this has happened in Afghanistan, what would we be doing?”
American Historian Bill Federer, gives a ‘Cliff Notes’ type summary of our founding fathers’ pesky Pirate problem, saying, “ ‘From the halls of Montezuma to the shores of Tripoli’ – the Marine anthem (hymn) recalls when Muslim Barbary Pirates of North Africa committed terrorist acts on American ships, selling crews into slavery. Tripoli demanded tribute and a treaty was attempted, but it was not honored as the Koran prohibited friendship with infidels. President Jefferson finally sent in the Marines, and in what Admiral Horatio Nelson described as the ‘most bold and daring act of the age,’ Lieut. Stephen Decatur sailed his ship, the Intrepid, on the night of February 16, 1804, into the pirate harbor, burned a ship and escaped unharmed amidst fierce enemy fire. The Marines captured Tripoli and forced the Pasha to make peace on U.S. terms.” (See photo of US Marines battle in Tripoli.)
Federer gave the chapters and verses from the Koran that ‘justified’ such Pirate actions against US:
“Infidels are those who declare ‘God is Christ, the son of Mary'”-Surah 5:17;
“Infidels are those that say ‘God is one of three in a Trinity'”-Surah 5:73;
“Infidels are your sworn enemies”-Sura 4:101.
The Koran continued:
“Make war on the infidels”-Sura 9:123;
“When you meet the infidel in the battlefield strike off their heads”-Surah 47:4;
“Muhammad is Allah’s apostle, those who follow him are ruthless to the infidels”-Surah 48:29;
“Take neither Jews nor Christians for your friends”-Surah 5:51.
Wikipedia has written: “On Jefferson’s inauguration as president in 1801, Yussif Karamanli, the Pasha (or Bashaw) of Tripoli, demanded $225,000 from the new administration. (In 1800, Federal revenues totaled a little over $10 million.) Putting his long-held beliefs into practice, Jefferson refused the demand.”
More from Wikipedia: “Jefferson reported the conversation to Secretary of State John Jay, who submitted the Ambassador’s comments and offer to Congress. Jefferson argued that paying tribute would encourage more attacks. Although John Adams agreed with Jefferson, he believed that circumstances forced the U.S. to pay tribute until an adequate navy could be built. The U.S. had just fought an exhausting war, which put the nation deep in debt. Federalist and anti-federalist forces argued over the needs of the country and the burden of taxation. Jefferson’s own Democratic-Republicans and anti-navalists believed that the future of the country lay in westward expansion, with Atlantic trade threatening to siphon money and energy away from the new nation on useless wars in the Old World. The U.S. paid Algiers the ransom, and continued to pay up to $1 million per year over the next 15 years for the safe passage of American ships or the return of American hostages. Payments in ransom and tribute to the privateering states amounted to 20 percent of United States government annual revenues in 1800. Jefferson continued to argue for cessation of the tribute, with rising support from George Washington and others. With the recommissioning of the American navy in 1794 and the resulting increased firepower on the seas, it became increasingly possible for America to refuse paying tribute, although by now the long-standing habit was hard to overturn.”
American Historian Bill Federer, gives a ‘Cliff Notes’ type summary of our founding fathers’ pesky Pirate problem, saying, “ ‘From the halls of Montezuma to the shores of Tripoli’ – the Marine anthem (hymn) recalls when Muslim Barbary Pirates of North Africa committed terrorist acts on American ships, selling crews into slavery. Tripoli demanded tribute and a treaty was attempted, but it was not honored as the Koran prohibited friendship with infidels. ”
How ever infidels may pay a TAX for the privledge of continued life…..
is it just me or does the money and guns funneled through the brotherhood seem like a tribute?
Could the reason we are doing all these things which are so…..discordant be because we have to pay tribute and Obama is keeping this under wraps?